Lazy Sod
Member
- Location
- Warminster Wiltshire
The Supreme court has ruled the plan to be unlawful. Apparently, the government has no plan B. What next?
The Rwanda Plan
- Thread starter Lazy Sod
- Start date
New Government
serf
Member
- Location
- warwickshire
Wow what a surprise result 
Said no one ever .....
Said no one ever .....
It's not much of a legal loss for the government because the Supreme Court do seem to be saying that the principle that asylum seekers can be deported is OK, just not to an unsafe country or to a country which may send them to an unsafe country.
However it a massive practical loss and perhaps the second part is like trying to prove a negative and can never be satisfied.
However it a massive practical loss and perhaps the second part is like trying to prove a negative and can never be satisfied.
- Location
- Westish Suffolk
Oh dear.
Home sec wants sacking...
Home sec wants sacking...
- Location
- Limousin, France
Pieces_of_Eight
Member
How many actually made it to Rwanda?
- Location
- Montgomeryshire
None. But we've built some nice sheds to house them in.
Hopefully not too many as they would now no doubt have to be brought back to the UK and given compensation.
caveman
Member
- Location
- East Sussex.
I wonder how many Serco shares those old duffers hold?
Paddington
Member
- Location
- Soggy Shropshire
Is the reciprocal part of the Rwanda agreement still valid, ie Rwandan subjects are allowed to come here ?
- Location
- South Wales UK
- Location
- South Wales UK
What other Country will like huge "sweetener " allegedly, now we wonder?
- Location
- Westish Suffolk
I believe our Suella went in a large jet on her own. She might have had a photographer go with her to prove she went along..
At least the barge plan went to plan...
Pieces_of_Eight
Member
If it's legal to send illegal migrants to third countries, just not to Rwanda, there will be African countries queueing up to take our taxpayers' money.
grainboy
Member
- Location
- Bedfordshire
But do we get back the £ millions all ready paid to Rwanda, !!!
- Location
- South Wales UK
Or off FRANCE who should of STOPPED them in the beginning????
- Location
- SW Scotland
They'll be leaving it on account because, apparently, the government's working on a new deal with Rwanda
Pieces_of_Eight
Member
Would it be lawful to put them straight back on a boat to France (probably after finger-printing)?
Danllan
Member
- Location
- Sir Gar / Carms
Well, no surprise in this at all. The Supremes have merely pointed out the bleeding obvious; this doesn't stop deportations taking place, it completely stops them to Rwanda until it is deemed a satisfactory destination.
There have been rumours that the EU 'Border Force' are going to be instructed to take any who are found at sea back to North Africa. That would solve a great deal of the problem for the EU countries and, following on, for us too. But I'll believe it when I see it happen.
I write that because a French chum reckons that if MLP ever makes to be president, unlikely but possible, she'll be binned after a single term because she simply won't be able to do what she reckons about immigration. And that will see her house of cards tumble down.
Not that I reckon Labour will do any better here, or will even want to do anything more than seem to be trying to do something - they need more 'minorities' to bolster their vote.
Nothing in any current law or treaty we have subscribed to would preclude that. But we all know that France has not been and is not acting in good faith in this matter. Of course the French don't want even more third world immigrants staying there, they already have more than enough who want to stay in France and that lot are already making things difficult.
There have been rumours that the EU 'Border Force' are going to be instructed to take any who are found at sea back to North Africa. That would solve a great deal of the problem for the EU countries and, following on, for us too. But I'll believe it when I see it happen.
I write that because a French chum reckons that if MLP ever makes to be president, unlikely but possible, she'll be binned after a single term because she simply won't be able to do what she reckons about immigration. And that will see her house of cards tumble down.
Not that I reckon Labour will do any better here, or will even want to do anything more than seem to be trying to do something - they need more 'minorities' to bolster their vote.